Survey

Instructions: Please answer the following questions to provide feedback to make improvements to the Native American curriculum web. When you are done click the "Click Here to Email Your Feedback" button at the bottom of the survey.

If you are unable to email from your current computer, download the Curriculum Web Evaluation Rubric below. Use it to evaluate the website and email me the results or attatch it to an email at your convenience. Contact address is alfredm@csdk12.org.

Evaluation Rubric

How would you rate the technical difficulties you encountered on the site?

4: The site contained no technical problems.
3: The site had very few technical problems.
2: The site had several major technical problems.
1: The site had many major technical problems.

What were the nature of the technical problems?

Please type in any errors found on this site.:

Was the website easy to read and aesthetically pleasing?

4: The site was easy to read and looked excellent.
3: The site was fairly easy to read and looked good.
2: The site was readable and looked okay.
1: The site was hard to read and did not look good.

Any comments on site appearance:

Was the site in a logical order and was it easy to follow along?

4: The site was in a logical order and it was easy to follow along.
3: The site was in a decent logical order and was fairly easy to follow along.
2: The site was not in a good logical order and somewhat confusing to follow.
1: The site was not in a logical order and was very difficult to navigate through the site.

Any comments about the order of lesson or navigation:

Was the first mission clear and well developed?

4: The first mission was very clear and well developed.
3: The first mission was fairly clear and fairly well developed.
2: The first mission was marginally clear and not well developed.
1: The first mission was not clear or well developed.

Additional comments on mission one:

Was the second mission clear and well developed?

4: The second mission was very clear and well developed.
3: The second mission was fairly clear and fairly well developed.
2: The second mission was marginally clear and not well developed.
1: The second mission was not clear or well developed.

Additional comments on mission two:

Was the third mission clear and well developed?

4: The third mission was very clear and well developed.
3: The third mission was fairly clear and fairly well developed.
2: The third mission was marginally clear and not well developed.
1: The third mission was not clear or well developed.

Additional comments on mission three:

Was the fourth mission clear and well developed?

4: The fourth mission was very clear and well developed.
3: The fourth mission was fairly clear and fairly well developed.
2: The fourth mission was marginally clear and not well developed.
1: The fourth mission was not clear or well developed.